In jüngster Zeit sind mir zwei Texte besonders aufgefallen. Auf einen stieß ich über Blendle, den anderen las ich in der SZ. In ersterem dreht sich alles um die Auswirkungen von finanzieller Ungleichheit. Hier ein Auszug: The blame shifting and negative messages mean that money remains the final societal taboo for women, wrapped in shame. For many women, there is no amount of money they can earn that they are comfortable sharing with friends: It’s either too much or too little. If a woman makes more than her male partner, she is given the message that she emasculates him. That’s why both genders are more likely to lie about their income in those circumstances, according to a Census Bureau study (men inflate what they make, while women deflate) and why those marriages are more likely to end in divorce. The result is that women prefer to talk about literally any other subject more than money—including our own deaths, a Merrill Lynch study found last year. Spannend, oder? Und Martin Eisenhut von der Unternehmensberatung A.T. Kearney schreibt in der SZ, welche Möglichkeiten männliche Führungskräfte haben, um Frauen zu fördern.